wulaw  
image image image image image
image
Modern Data (1946 - 2017) Legacy Data (1791 - 1945) Analysis Results
Analysis Case Detail
Analysis Specifications Analysis Outcome
Unit of Analysis n/a
Analysis Case Count 53 (of 8,631 possible records)
Relevant Scope 2009 - 2010
Using Data Release SCDB_2015_01
Search Reference Code 1501-TWOFOLD-6748
Analysis
Overview
Issues
Summary
Frequency
Distributions
Crosstab
Reports
Case
Details
         
Supreme Court Detail
Case Name
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, PETITIONER v. VINCENT CONCEPTION ET UX
LEXIS | Westlaw | FindLaw | CourtListener
Note: FindLaw and CourtListener are free services.
Date Decision April 27, 2011
Date Argument November 09, 2010
Decision Type opinion of the court (orally argued)
Citations 131 S. Ct. 1740
2011 U.S. LEXIS 3367
179 L. Ed. 2d 742
Docket 09-893

Lower Court Detail
Court in which Case Originated California Southern U.S. District Court
Court whose Decision was Reviewed U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Petitioner telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company
Respondent consumer, consumer organization

Vote Detail
Issue/Legal Provision
(1 of 2)
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
Arbitration (other Than As Pertains To Labor-management Or Employer-employee Relations (cf. Union Arbitration)
INFREQUENTLY LITIGATED STATUTES
Infrequently litigated statutes
Vote Coalition 5 - 4
Decision Direction Conservative
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Scalia
Kennedy
Roberts
Alito
regular concurrence
Thomas
dissent
Ginsburg
Breyer
Sotomayor
Kagan
Issue/Legal Provision
(2 of 2)
FEDERALISM
Federal Pre-emption Of State Legislation Or Regulation. Cf. State Regulation Of Business. Rarely Involves Union Activity. Does Not Involve Constitutional Interpretation Unless The Court Says It Does.
INFREQUENTLY LITIGATED STATUTES
Infrequently litigated statutes
Vote Coalition 5 - 4
Decision Direction Liberal
Justice Votes
voted with majority or plurality
Scalia
Kennedy
Roberts
Alito
regular concurrence
Thomas
dissent
Ginsburg
Breyer
Sotomayor
Kagan

Supreme Court Database Detail
SCDB ID 2010-040-01

Return to case listing
  CONTACT   TOP
Modern Data (1946 - 2017) Legacy Data (1791 - 1945) Analysis Results
image The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation. Creative Commons License

washu_logo