wulaw  
image image image image image
The Supreme Court Database is the definitive source for researchers, students, journalists, and citizens interested in the U.S. Supreme Court. The Database contains over two hundred pieces of information about each case decided by the Court between the 1791 and 2014 terms. Examples include the identity of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed, the parties to the suit, the legal provisions considered in the case, and the votes of the Justices.

MODERN Database
2015 Release 03
released
April 08, 2016

includes terms
1946 - 2014


LEGACY Database
SCDB Legacy 02
released
April 08, 2016

includes terms
1791 - 1945

Are you interested in a particular legal or political issue? Do you seek information about the current Court or about a particular year? Perhaps you are interested in the votes of the Justices in cases about religion, commerce, or another area of the law. The analysis tools allow you to select and summarize cases from the Modern or Legacy Database based on your needs. Getting Started
Are you new to the Supreme Court Database? Wondering how to start doing your online analysis? The SCDB Web 101 series can get you underway on the quick.
View the 101 Lessons


Looking for the Codebook? We have an online and downloadable version. Access them using the below links.
  • WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH V. HELLERSTEDT
    A critical part of today’s analysis showed that Texas, which tried to justify its restrictions as health measures, had imposed significant obstacles to abortion access without evidence that health benefits were gained or were even needed.

    Email * Read More
  • UNITED STATES V. TEXAS
    The court’s decision allows two exceptionally conservative judges who sit on one regional court, of the plaintiffs’ choosing, to substitute their personal policy preferences for those of a democratically elected president.

    Email * Read More
  • SPOKEO, INC. V. ROBINS
    The surprising decision actually gives Congress a green light to allow consumers to sue corporations or online sites that violate their privacy rights or consumer protection laws.

    Email * Read More
  • ZUBIK V. BURWELL
    Instead of punting in this ongoing battle against contraceptive coverage, the Supreme Court should have recognized that eight out of nine courts of appeals got the case right.

    Email * Read More
  • HEFFERNAN V. CITY OF PATERSON, NEW JERSEY
    Justice Thomas’ dissent in Heffernan is one of only a handful of recent opinions to recognize the right of assembly as distinct from free speech.

    Email * Read More
Learn more about this collection View Download Options MODERN Database
LEGACY Database
Online Codebook
PDF Codebook
More Expert Commentary
image image image image image
image The Supreme Court Database has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation. Creative Commons License

washu_logo